with the scientific collaboration of
ISSN 2611-8858

Posts

At detention facilities, legal rights 'in name only'

Whether we call them 'concentration camps' or detention centers, the lack of justice for those seeking refuge must end

Conduct constituting the offence of laundering

Remarks to the Directive (UE) 2018/1673 of the Europian Parliament and the Council, 23rd October 2018, concerning money laundering and criminal law

The Court of Justice of the European Union on the Relation Between the Repetition of Oral Evidence Due to a Change in the Bench Composition and the Orotection of Crime Victims

Court of Justice of the European Union, First Chamber, judg. 29 July 2019, case C-38/18, criminal proceedings against Massimo Gambino, Shpetim Hyka

Sanzioni disciplinari penitenziarie e legittimità convenzionale del doppio binario sanzionatorio

Sommario: 1. La natura giuridica delle sanzioni disciplinari previste dall’ordinamento penitenziario: introduzione. – 2) La presa di posizione della Suprema Corte. – 3. Ulteriori interventi della giurisprudenza di legittimità: Cass. pen., Sez. II, 16 febbraio 2018, n. 23043. – 4. Considerazioni conclusive.

Perpetual Life Imprisonment Violates the European Convention of Human Rights

Prison benefits also for those who do not cooperate

L’ente collettivo nell’arcipelago delle misure di contrasto alle infiltrazioni della criminalità organizzata nel sistema economico

Sommario: 1. Ambientamento dell’indagine. – 2. L’evoluzione della prevenzione antimafia tra la l. 575/1965 e la l. 646/1982. – 3. La prevenzione mediante organizzazione nel decreto legislativo 231/01 secondo lo “Stick and carrot approach”. – 3.1. La responsabilità degli enti collettivi per fatti di criminalità organizzata. – 4. Gli enti collettivi nel Codice Antimafia. – 5. Le misure di contrasto alle infiltrazioni mafiose nella disciplina anticorruzione: il comma 10 dell’art. 32, d.l. 90/2014. – 6. Notazioni conclusive.

A look back at the Supreme Court’s October 2018 term

The text, after a general overview of the current composition of the U.S. Supreme Court, with reference to its ideological balance, proceeds to the review of the main decisions issued during the 2018/2019 Term, with particular attention to the constitutional-criminal jurisprudence. Two judgments on the principle of legality, drafted by the originalist/textualist Justice Neil Gorsuch are examined, highlighting his contribution to strengthening that constitutional safeguard. We then proceed to the examination of the recent death penalty jurisprudence, a context in which the strengthened conservative majority, in order to guarantee at all costs the effectiveness of the extreme sanction and the protection of the victim rights, seems to give a new "restrictive" turn to the interpretation of the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and to the criteria for assessing last-minute petitions by capital convicts. This trend could call into question several settled precedents. Taking into account other criminal law decisions issued in the Term just ended, we focus conclusively on the cases that will be decided in the upcoming 2019/2020 Term, positing what could be some of the future developments in the criminal law area

U.S. Judges Admit Enhanced Interrogation Is Torture

They also acknowledged, for the first time, that the grounds for torturing Abu Zubaydah - the Saudi Arabian citizen detained in the wake of September 11, still languishing in Guantánamo - were mistaken

Per sempre dietro le sbarre? L'ergastolo ostativo nel dialogo tra le Corti

Debate organised by the University of Ferrara

Deportations Reduce Crime? That’s Not What the Evidence Shows

An interesting article about the relationship between deportations and criminality. (Gian Luigi Gatta)